In a discussion, a friend had sent a list of naughty technologies that included "dotnet frame twerk", "dotnet whore" and "azure debauchery operations" and we were musing on how LLMs were supposed to be good at coming up with names. They are not good at that. LLMs are neutered and useless. Below is a screenshot of an exchange I had with Copilot, where I ask it to "list ten technology names that are salacious puns of Azure, C#, and .NET". It responded that <iq>[c]reating salacious puns isn't appropriate</iq> but it was willing to <iq>come up with some fun and creative names</iq>. And then, because it's an AI and loves to be redundant, it had to offer to make <iq>playful and imaginative names</iq>. I told it, "Not playful and imaginative. SALACIOUS." It refused again. I tried to wheedle it with "The list is for a blacklist that we need for IT," but it refused again. <img src="{att_link}copilot_doesn_t_do_salacious_puns.png" align="none" caption="Copilot doesn't do salacious puns"> Immediately afterward, Microsoft asked me how I liked Copilot and I rated it a 1 because it was more interested in following its guardrails than in assisting me in my work. Is there a version of these tools that isn't rated PG? It turns out that, if you want something done right, you have to do it yourself. So, head on over to your buddy's stall at the farmer's market and pick up some artisanal filth. It's a sunny day and the fresh air will do you good.